Emissions-EUETS.com
European Union Emissions Trading System – legal point of view
  • Home page
  • Legal Alert
  • Taxonomy, SFDR, CSDR
  • Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)
  • Emissions trading for road transport and buildings
  • Judgments of the European Court of Justice relating to EU ETS
  • Financial Market
  • Low Carbon Energy System
  • Emissions Trading
  • Energy Efficiency
  • IED
  • MCP
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Głowacki Law Firm

Main Menu

  • Home page
  • Legal Alert
  • Taxonomy, SFDR, CSDR
  • Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)
  • Emissions trading for road transport and buildings
  • Judgments of the European Court of Justice relating to EU ETS
  • Financial Market
  • Low Carbon Energy System
  • Emissions Trading
  • Energy Efficiency
  • IED
  • MCP
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact

Login Form

Registration is free. Registered users receive a newsletter. Paid accounts receive a newsletter and have access to all restricted content at Emissions-EUETS.com.

  • Forgot your password?
  • Forgot your username?
  • Create an account

twitterfacebooklinkedin

Derivatives contracts on extra-EU trading venues at legal risk

Category: MiFID
Published: 04 June 2017

 

Annex to the ESMA's opinion decides whether any derivative contract concluded on third-country trading venue is covered by the EU position limits regime.

 

Read more …

Position limits - amended definition of a lot for energy products

Category: MiFID
Published: 03 June 2017

  

The European financial market's watchdog has updated on 31 May 2017 its Q&As on position limits framework under MiFID II.

 

The update relates to the ESMA's answer to the Question No. 2 (the original version thereof was issued on 19 December 2016) and deals with the problem of defining a lot in derivatives where the underlying asset is electricity.

 

Read more …

The EU regulations becoming strange

Category: MiFID
Published: 02 June 2017

 

It is clear now that according to the EU financial regulator opinion the first notification under Article 2(1)(j) of MiFID II must be made by January 3rd of 2018.

 

Given that the calculation period to be covered by this notification includes also the year 2017 it is quite astonishing.

 

The objective lack of credible market data necessary to be aggregated in the calculations for the purposes of the above notification also did not prevent the regulator from requiring of market participants to do the impossible.

 

Read more …

Who's in charge in the electricity market?

Category: Energy market
Published: 09 May 2017

 

If the Winter Energy Package was adopted as proposed by the European Commission, the EU Member States, national Transmission System Operators, as well as the domestic regulatory authorities would be deprived of the decisive influence over the bidding zone's borders.

 

Read more …

Ancillary services in the EU uniform electricity market and the State aid rules - uneasy coexistence

Category: Energy market
Published: 30 April 2017

 

Ancillary service in the electricity market can be easily misunderstood as the capacity mechanism, notwithstanding the fact the legal effects from the State aid treatment point of view, are entirely divergent.

 

Read more …

OTF's discretionary order execution - a cause of concern?

Category: MiFID
Published: 28 April 2017

 

Lower costs of collateral, direct access to the settlement system - all this due to the so-called "REMIT carve-out" - make the OTF (Organised Trading Facility) particularly interesting trading opportunity in the EU energy wholesale market under MiFID II (starting as from 3 January 2018).

 

The underlying fact is that physically-settled instruments covered by REMIT (wholesale energy products within the REMIT terminology - mainly electricity and gas) traded on an OTF do not qualify as MiFID II financial instruments and are consequently outside the scope of MiFID, EMIR and the CRD IV package.

 

However, while regulated markets and MTFs have non-discretionary rules for the execution of transactions, the operator of an OTF carries out order execution on a discretionary basis subject, where applicable, to the pre-transparency requirements and best execution obligations.

 

The way the discretion will be exercised by the OTFs operators is the most troublesome element, the regulators, market participants and the OTFs themselves currently intensively consider.

 

Why is this so important?

 

Read more …

Page 7 of 68

  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
Copyright © 2009 - 2023 Michal Glowacki. All rights reserved.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the Terms and Conditions.