|
Meaningless trading phases of the EU ETS
|
|
Title transfer collateral arrangement, emission allowances and SFTR - difficult coexistence
|
|
CSCF invalidated, but not entirely
|
|
World of thresholds
|
|
Second chance to exclude small installations from the EU ETS
|
|
EU ETS New Entrant Reserve - oversized?
|
|
EU ETS rules beyond 2020 revealed - benchmarks key for business models
|
|
The consequences of subjecting professional emissions trading on own account to MiFID II rules
|
|
Emissions OTC derivative contracts between EU branches of non-equivalent third countries subjected to EMIR
|
|
EUAM - a new type of emission allowances?
|
|
California Allowance Price Containment Reserve not so interesting for traders
|
|
Will the second carbon leakage list be used to intervene in the market?
|
|
Some jurisdictional issues regarding California and Quebec ETS linking
|
|
Revisions to JI guidelines and to modalities and procedures for the CDM pursuant to Doha decisions
|
|
'Doha Climate Gateway’ - and what about ERUs?
|
|
Procedure for linking EU ETS with other emissions trading schemes – technicalities important for practice
|
|
Borrowing of carbon units under EU ETS, California and Australia emission trading schemes
|
|
Banking of units under EU ETS, California and Australia emission trading schemes
|
|
Further developments as regards carbon markets position limits
|
|
What is resource shuffling and why it can cause problems
|
|
Push-Push-Pull – new proposition to improve the registries safety
|
|
First Deliverers of Electricity as covered entities under California cap-and-trade – a few remarks on equal treatment
|
|
Draft Regulation on central securities depositories – relation with the emission market
|
|
EC vs. ITRE – status for the physically settled forward products in MiFID II at stake
|
|
Legal complications with cross-border collateral EUAs arrangements after recent Registry Regulation amendment
|
|
Extending Financial Collateral Directive to spot emissions allowances trade – why not?
|
|
Alert for California potential opt-in entities
|
|
Global price for carbon - medium or longer term perspective?
|
|
Legal nature of emission allowances as a property rights
|
|
Transfer of EUAs as a proof of ownership
|
|
Risk assessment report - State aid rules regarding carbon leakage sectors
|
|
State aid rules regarding aid involved in optional transitional free allowances for the modernisation of electricity generation – unfeasible for beneficiaries?
|
|
The protection of the good faith acquirer of emission allowances and finality of transactions in the new Registry Regulation – do they cause traders feel more comfortable?
|
|
Qualitative restrictions, CERs and ERUs banking and other modalities with respect to Kyoto units in the third trading period
|
|
EIB is ready to monetise phase three allowances
|
|
The Polish NAP corrected ex post
|
|
Preparations for California cap-and-trade auctions
|
|
Emission allowances position limits – transatlantic approach common in principle but methods of realisation different
|
|
Consequences of the new MAD Regulation regime for inside information for the emission allowances market – the threshold decisive
|
|
MIFID II and emissions – consequences under preliminary investigation
|
|
Discrepancies in views on the finality of transfers in emission trading among EU ETS and California cap-and-trade regulators
|
|
The surrender of allowances initiated in error - the only reversible transaction pursuant to the draft of the Commission Regulation establishing a Union Registry of emission allowances
|
|
The implications of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) for commodity firms trading on the emissions market
|
|
The new Australian emissions market - eligible international emissions units
|
|
The new Australian emission market – will the investors wait till 2015?
|
|
Emissions allowances – are they property rights? Australia and California regulators’ views
|
|
Draft REMIT Regulation does not cover EUAs – but for how long?
|
|
CO2 emission performance standard – UK goes further than IED Directive
|
|
Why importers of electricity into EU don’t have compliance obligation under EUETS?
|
|
The possibility for freezing allowances and accounts – important change to the registry system
|
|
Investing in Californian emission allowances – formal requirements
|
|
Emissions market and EMIR – non-financial counterparties also covered
|
|
The draft of the Commission Regulation establishing a Union Registry of emission allowances - practical consequences for jurisdictional decisions as regards an account’s location
|
|
The definition of ‘inside information’ under REMIT – dubious without the EC and market input (II)
|
|
The draft of the Commission Regulation establishing a Union Registry – the finality of transfers rules and other details for the new security measures revealed
|
|
The definition of ‘inside information’ under REMIT – dubious without the EC and market input (I)
|
|
Europe-wide passport for wholesale trading in electricity and gas – still fragmentary perception of the production chain
|
|
EUAs as a financial instrument under MiFID - not yet
|
|
The volumes of early auctions specified but the method and detailed timelines for monetisation of phase 3 allowances from NER 300 still uncertain
|
|
ICE Futures Europe Circular 11/038 of 10 March 2011 – safeguarding the position of the Exchange but what about the traders?
|
|
Delivery delay mechanism in EU ETS registries – something like the RGGI design?
|
|
Enforcement of the surrender obligation and companies affiliations – something missing?
|
|
The Cost Containment Mechanisms in the California Cap-and-Trade Program – why absent in the EUETS?
|
|
The publicness of the data held in the CO2 allowances registries – pivotal principles decided by the recent judgment
|
|
Legal complications with the recovery of the stolen allowances
|
|
Extending regulatory safeguards of the MAD Directive to the spot markets in electricity and emission allowances – will this change so much?
|
|
SO2 and NOx trading – the new interesting instance of the national scheme
|
|
Article 11a(9) of the Directive 2003/87/EC – a headache for compliance buyers
|
|
Daily Futures Contracts listed on ECX – assessment under MIFID and Regulation No 1287/2006
|
|
What’s new with standards for accounting for emission allowances
|
|
EUA/CER spread tendency and the legal framework for CER’s after 2012
|
|
Emissions trading - the law applicable to the contract in the absence of choice
|
|
The Community guidelines on State aid and EUETS after 2013 – changes urgently needed
|
|
Banking of EUA’s – is the Directive 2003/87/EC properly implemented?
|
|
The authorization for brokers dealing in CO2 spot markets?
|
|
The new SO2 i NOx emissions market in Poland – some issues are controversial
|
|
Banking and borrowing under EU ETS and Boxer Kerry US draft of the new legislation
|
|
EUAs and CERs as a security
|
|
Why can’t new investments in Polish power generators benefit from derogation laid down in Article 10c of the Directive EU ETS
|
|
Polish emission trading bill – unfortunately with many mistakes
|
|
Polish national and sectoral plans of emissions reduction – is this risk manageable?
|
|
The method of accruing interest under the IETA Master Agreement and the Polish Civil Code
|
|
An error in the Polish text of the climate legislation
|
