Emissions trading
MIFID II and emissions – consequences under preliminary investigation
Tuesday, 01 November 2011 15:45


Currently, MiFID does not apply to the secondary trading of spot emission allowances.

What are the pivotal elements of the Commissions proposal on MiFID II as regards emissions? The issue of reclassification of emission allowances as financial instruments was extensively covered by media but is this really the case that capturing spot emissions trading by financial market legal infrastructure effects in entirely win-win situation for everybody? No, it isn’t and the Commission itself admits so in accompanying documents to the MiFID II/MiFIR proposals.

 

Read more...
 
Discrepancies in views on the finality of transfers in emission trading among EU ETS and California cap-and-trade regulators
Monday, 17 October 2011 06:15


Final Regulation Order, version of October 2011 on California cap on greenhouse gas emissions and market-based compliance mechanisms has been currently posted on the website of the Californian Air Resources Board, together with accompanying documentation, among others, four Compliance Offsets Protocols.

Considering the potential participation in both GHG compliance programs: the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme and its Californian counterpart, it is noteworthy that the registry rules provided for in the Californian scheme are founded on the fundamentally different principle in the practical and legal functioning as regards the finality of transfers.

 

Last Updated on Thursday, 20 October 2011 21:06
Read more...
 
The surrender of allowances initiated in error - the only reversible transaction pursuant to the draft of the Commission Regulation establishing a Union Registry of emission allowances
Monday, 05 September 2011 06:27

 

Initiating transactions and processes in the Union emissions registry after the new draft regulation enters into force will require careful consideration because the reversal of potential errors, mistakes and irregularities will be, in principle, legally and technically impossible.

Article 36(5) of the Regulation provides literally that during the 24-hour delay ‘an account representative may propose to the national administrator the cancellation of the transfer on the grounds of a suspicion that the transfer was initiated fraudulently’. Such a wording may create some doubts as regards the issue whether an account representative may propose to the national administrator the cancellation of the transfer on the grounds of a erroneously or mistakenly initiated transfer.

Read more...
 
The implications of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) for commodity firms trading on the emissions market
Monday, 29 August 2011 07:03


As follows from Article 7(4) read in conjunction with Article 7(2) of the EMIR, for the qualification whether an OTC transaction regarding any derivative contract set out in Annex I Section C numbers (4) to (10) of the MiFID (including, consequently, also derivatives for which the underlying asset are emission allowances) entered into by the commodity firm, is subject to the clearing obligation, the decisive significance have two premises:

1) the positive: the breach of the clearing threshold value (to be specified by the European Commission through a delegated act),

2) the negative: the ability of the OTC derivative contracts entered into by a commodity firm to be objectively measured as directly linked to the commercial activity of that counterparty.

 

Read more...
 
The new Australian emissions market - eligible international emissions units
Thursday, 25 August 2011 14:21


One of the most interesting things for investors in the Australian emission trading scheme will surely be the eligibility of international emissions units as compliance instruments under the scheme rules.

 

Read more...
 
The new Australian emission market – will the investors wait till 2015?
Wednesday, 24 August 2011 21:13


In the period from 1 July 2012 to 1 July 2015 the new Australian emission market won’t really be a fully-fledged cap-and-trade.

 

Read more...
 
Emissions allowances – are they property rights? Australia and California regulators’ views
Tuesday, 23 August 2011 20:06

 

As was reminded also in the accompanying documents to the MIFiD Directive recent review, the legal classification of emission allowances is not uniform in EU Member States. The said documents observed that some Member States consider emission allowances as property rights, whereas others consider them personal rights.

The nature and characteristics of these allowances (certificate giving the right  to emit 1 metric tonne of CO2) could lend themselves to be classified as an intangible asset or a physical commodity. Emission allowances themselves are not classified as financial instruments under MiFID. On the other hand, derivative contracts on these allowances (and other environmental credits) are financial instruments under MiFID under the same criteria as derivatives on commodities.

 

This interesting theoretical, but burdened also with multiple practical implications, discussion have moved recently into other continents with the spreading of cap-and-trades.

 

Read more...
 
Draft REMIT Regulation does not cover EUAs – but for how long?
Friday, 05 August 2011 15:47

 

From the systemic point of view there is no reason, why gas would be treated differently, for the purposes of establishing a coherent regulatory regime for the integrity and transparency of the wholesale energy products, than other fuels for the production of the electricity - like coal, oil and even biomass.

 

Read more...
 
CO2 emission performance standard – UK goes further than IED Directive
Thursday, 21 July 2011 22:10

 

On the surge of recent criticism as regards poor performance of the EU ETS as a means of emission reductions, EPS is minded as a regulatory backstop which will limit the emissions from new fossil-fired power stations. It has to be taken into account in any power generation business projections – in the UK for now.

 

Read more...
 
Why importers of electricity into EU don’t have compliance obligation under EUETS?
Monday, 11 July 2011 21:42


It is common knowledge that power producers in many countries outside the EU are not facing carbon constraints similar to those present under European Union Emissions Trading Scheme.

As a consequence, there are, however, investors that consider building power facilities outside the EU and importing electricity (provided technical and regulatory requirements allow). It seems that such a situation may be perceived as a regulatory gap that should be eliminated as quick as possible in order to avoid undermining the objectives of the revised EU ETS Directive.

 

Read more...
 
The possibility for freezing allowances and accounts – important change to the registry system
Friday, 24 June 2011 07:00

 

The possibility “for freezing allowances and accounts” is specified in more detail in Articles 70, 71 and 73 of the Commission’s proposal for the Registry Regulation amendment and amounts to three differing legal measures with distinct premises, effects and entities authorised to use them, i.e.:

- suspension of all access by authorised representatives,

- suspension of access to allowances or Kyoto units,

- suspension of processes.

 

Read more...
 
Investing in Californian emission allowances – formal requirements
Wednesday, 01 June 2011 07:00

 

What does it mean CA GHG Allowance? If somebody wish to invest in such an assets for strictly speculative purposes should apply to ARB to become VAE. Beneath an approximation of what could be expected from an investor taking into account purely formal aspects of the potential application. The issue may gain quite practical importance in 2012 already.

 

Read more...
 
Emissions market and EMIR – non-financial counterparties also covered
Thursday, 19 May 2011 14:48

 

The Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (commonly referred to as the European Market Infrastructure Regulation - EMIR) provides for some new obligations envisioned to be imposed on non-financial counterparties (among others commodity firms) acting also on the emission market. The impacts are far-reaching and may require mayor organisational changes among market participants. There are also ambiguities regarding the practical implementation of the new measure.

 

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next > End >>

Page 3 of 5

Cap-and-Trade Schemes

Flexible Mechanisms

Search

Twitter
Copyright © 2009 - 2017 Michal Glowacki. All rights reserved.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer